投稿问答最小化  关闭

万维书刊APP下载

史上最全回复审稿意见指南(下)

2024/4/8 11:16:38  阅读:21 发布者:

上文中我们描述了一些回复审稿意见时的小细节和礼仪,本文将阐述同意、反对审稿人建议以及审稿人之间意见相左该如何回复~

1

当你同意审稿人建议时...

这是最简单的情况。承认论文中存在的问题,并确认你已经做出修改即可。

示例:

· We thank the reviewer for pointing this out. We have revised.

· We have removed.

· We agree and have updated.

· We have fixed the error.

· This observation is correct. We have changed.

· We have made the change. The new sentence reads as follows.

2

当你不同意审稿人意见时...

编辑回复时一定要注意措辞。首先,强调你对审稿人的建议表示赞同。然后再解释为什么没有做出修改。

例子:

✔ We agree with the reviewer that further elaborating on this point using new data would be helpful. However, we believe that expanding our dataset is neither feasible, given the costs involved, nor would significantly support our argument. For this reason, we chose not to make this change, but we added the following sentence to paragraph 3 in the discussion: “Though having a larger dataset would offer further insight…”.

我们同意审稿人的这条意见:在这一点上使用新数据进一步阐述会更有帮助。然而,我们认为,考虑到所涉及的成本,扩展我们的数据库既不可行,对我们的论点也不会有显著影响。出于这些原因,我们选择不做这个修改,但我们在讨论部分的第3段中添加了以下句子:“尽管使用更大的数据库将提供更深入的了解……”

✔ We apologize if our original Figure 2 did not show…. We did not intend to…. We have modified the figure and hope that it is now clear that…. We believe that adding a new figure, as the reviewer suggested, would be unnecessary given that our new Figure 2 shows….

(如果最初的图2没有显示清楚我们深表歉意,我们已修改了该图表,希望现在可以清楚地看到图表中的内容。我们认为,按照审稿人的建议,添加新图表是不必要的,因为我们已经对图2做出了修改。)

✔ We appreciate the reviewer’s insightful suggestion and agree that it would be useful to demonstrate that…; however, such an analysis is beyond the scope of our paper, which aims only to show that…. Nevertheless, we recognize this limitation should be mentioned in the paper, so we added the following sentence….

(我们感谢审稿人的建议并同意证明以下几点很有用……;然而,这样的分析超出了本论文的范围,我们的目的只是想表明……但是,我们认识到这一局限性在论文中应该提到,所以我们增加了以下句子…...

总之,无论你同意还是不同意审稿人的建议,都要证明你理解他们的建议并认真对待他们所提出的建议。

3

当审稿人意见不一致时...

当审稿者们给了你不一致的建议时,不要回答:“As another reviewer suggested the opposite, we didn’t change the text.(另一个审稿人的建议正好相反,所以我们没有修改文本。)。必须选择你所赞同的建议,然后向另一个审稿人证明你的选择。例如,你可以这样说,“As we received conflicting advice from another reviewer, we decided to make the change they suggested, because…. We hope this was the right decision. (我们从另一个审稿人那里收到了不一致的建议,我们决定按照他的建议来做修改,因为……,我们希望这是一个正确的决定。)

对审稿人的建议进行回复是件苦差事,因为没有人喜欢自己的论文被批评。但是,如果你把审稿人的建议看作是一个改进你研究论文的机会,那就会减少很多负担,大概这就是传说中的精神胜利法吧~

祝大家论文发表顺利!

转自艾德思EditSprings微信公众号,仅作学习交流,如有侵权,请联系本站删除!


  • 万维QQ投稿交流群    招募志愿者

    版权所有 Copyright@2009-2015豫ICP证合字09037080号

     纯自助论文投稿平台    E-mail:eshukan@163.com