10+医学期刊论著返修中的主编意见

课题组之前一篇论著收到的返修意见中的Editor's comments，对文稿撰写有极大帮助，共享几点：

10. Results: Throughout, please consistently and clearly indicate where you are reporting differences that are statistically significant, where you do not find statistically significant differences, and where differences are attenuated in related sensitivity analyses.

结果部分需要明确指出哪些结果具有统计学上的显著性意义，哪些结果没有统计学上的显著性差异，而且哪些差异在相关敏感性分析中弱化了

11. Discussion: Please present and organize the Discussion as follows: a short, clear summary of the article's findings; what the study adds to existing research and where and why the results may differ from previous research; strengths and limitations of the study; implications and next steps for research, clinical practice, and/or public policy; one-paragraph conclusion.

讨论部分需要结构化组织：

简明扼要地概述论文的主要发现；

哪些发现是本研究对这个领域在既有知识之外的贡献，本研究的哪些发现不同于先前的研究及可能的原因；

本研究的优缺点；

本研究的临床意义和展望；

一小段总结

15. Figures 2-5: Please provide a description in the legends to explain the colors used in the figures. If color comparisons are critical for the interpretation, please consider using colors other than red/green.

图的配色应优先使用红绿色盲友好型颜色，不同颜色的含义应在图例或图注中解释

16. PRISMA Checklist: Thank you for including the checklist. When completing the checklist, please use section and paragraph numbers, rather than page numbers.

转自“元思医学之新Meta分析与建模”微信公众号，本文仅作为学术交流分享，如有侵权，请联系本站删除！