万维书刊网微信二维码

扫微信,关注编辑QQ!

您的位置:万维书刊网 >>自然科学综合>>自然科学总论
您的位置:万维书刊网 >>国内sci期刊>>自然科学

中国科学:技术科学(英文)(Science China Technological Sciences) (官网投稿)

简介
  • 期刊简称待设置
  • 参考译名待设置
  • 核心类别 CSCD核心(2023-2024), 高质量科技期刊(T1), 高质量科技期刊(T3), SCIE(2024版), EI 中国期刊(2024版), 科技核心(2024自然科学), 知网收录, 目次收录(维普), 目次收录(万方),第一批认定学术期刊,外文期刊,
  • IF影响因子待设置
  • 自引率待设置
  • 主要研究方向待设置

主要研究方向:

等待设置主要研究方向
待设置

《中国科学:技术科学》(英文版)(Science China Technological Sciences)(月刊)创刊于1996年,是由中国科学院主管、中国科学院和国家自然科学基金委员会共同主办的自然科学综合性学术刊物,主要报道材料科学、机械工程、工程热物理、光学工程、水利、空间科学、航空航天、土木工程、核科学与技术、电工、建筑、工程力学等领域基础研究和应用研究方面具重要意义的创新性成果,由《中国科学》杂...[显示全部]
征稿信息

万维提示:

1、投稿方式:在线投稿。

2、刊内网址:(202308期)

http://tech.scichina.com

自动跳转至:https://www.sciengine.com/SCTS/home

http://www.springer.com/11431

http://link.springer.com/journal/11431

https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/scts(投稿系统)

3、出刊日期:月刊,每月1日出版。

2023810日星期四

                       


 

《中国科学:技术科学(英文)投稿须知

官网信息】

 

Instructions for authors

SCIENCE CHINA Technological Sciences

SCIENCE CHINA Technological Sciences is a monthly peer-reviewed academic journal supervised by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and co-sponsored by the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the National Natural Science Foundation of China. Its primary mission is to encourage communication of basic and innovative research results of high quality in the fields of technological sciences. The subject areas featured include materials science, nanotechnology, mechanical engineering, engineering thermophysics, hydraulic engineering, space science, astronomics, civil engineering, nuclear science and technology, electronic engineering, optical engineering, and engineering mechanics. All papers should be intelligible for a broad scientific audience.

Contributions are invited from researchers all over the world.

SCIENCE CHINA Technological Sciences is indexed by SCI, EI, MR, CA, etc.

Papers published in SCIENCE CHINA Technological Sciences include:

Research papers: report on important original results in all areas of technological sciences.

Reviews: summarize representative results and achievements in a particular topic or area, comment on the current research progress, and advise on the research directions, which should be based on or closely related to the author’s own research work.

Brief reports: present short reports in a timely manner of the latest important results.

News & Views: introduce or comment on recent scientific advances or issues that have major influence on science or scientific community.

How to submit

To submit a manuscript, please visit https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/scts, log on at ScholarOne Manuscript System, and follow the instructions to upload the text and image/table files. For a new user, please register an ―Author Account, and then submit a manuscript following the guidance.

Please introduce the research background, innovation and significance of your work, as well as your latest publications in a cover letter when submitting. The detailed contact information of the first author and corresponding author is required (please promptly inform the editorial office of any change of contacting addresses). The authors may recommend 3—5 qualified reviewers and/or request the exclusion of specific reviewers. An informative cover letter is considered helpful for editors and reviewers to evaluate your paper.

Duplicate submission is forbidden. In this case, we will inform the author’s institution and the relevant journal.

Poor English expression of a submitted manuscript may lead to the final rejection.

File format: single columned, A4 size, 10 pt, single spaced, word or pdf file, with figures and tables inserted in the text.

Reviewing policy

All submissions will be reviewed by referees selected by the editorial board. The decision of acceptance or rejection of a manuscript is made by the editorial board based on the referees’ reports. The entire review process may take 40 to 60 days, and the editorial office will inform the author of the decision as soon as the process is completed. If the editorial board fails to make a decision within 90 days, it is up to the authors to decide whether they would withdraw their paper and submit it elsewhere.

Ethical responsibilities of authors

This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct.

Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice, which includes:

The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.

The manuscript has not been published previously (partly or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work (please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the hint of text-recycling (“self-plagiarism”)).

A single study is not split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (e.g. salami-publishing”).

No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support your conclusions

No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the authors own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased), quotation marks are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions are secured for material that is copyrighted.

Important note: the journal may use software to screen for plagiarism.

Consent to submit has been received from all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out before the work is submitted.

Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and therefore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.

In addition:

Changes of authorship or in the order of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript.

Requests to add or delete authors at revision stage or after publication is a serious matter, and may be considered only after receipt of written approval from all authors and detailed explanation about the role/deletion of the new/deleted author.

The decision on accepting the change rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.

Upon request authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results. This could be in the form of raw data, samples, records, etc.

If there is a suspicion of misconduct, the journal will carry out an investigation following the

COPE guidelines. If, after investigation, the allegation seems to raise valid concerns, the accused author will be contacted and given an opportunity to address the issue. If misconduct has been proven, this may result in the Editor-in-Chief’s implementation of the following measures, including, but not limited to:

- If the article is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author.

- If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction, either an erratum will be placed with the article or in severe cases complete retraction of the article will occur. The reason must be given in the published erratum or retraction note.

- The author’s institution may be informed.

Authorship

Authorship should be limited to those who have contributed substantially to the work, and every author has responsibility for the data and argument mentioned in the paper. The corresponding author must have obtained permission from all authors for the submission of each version of the paper and for any change in authorship.

Disclosure of potential conflict of interests

Authors must disclose all relationships or interests that could influence or bias the work.

Although an author may not feel there are conflicts, disclosure of relationships and interests affords a more transparent process, leading to an accurate and objective assessment of the work. Awareness of real or perceived conflicts of interests is a perspective to which the readers are entitled and is not meant to imply that a financial relationship with an organization that sponsored the research or compensation for consultancy work is inappropriate. Examples of potential conflicts of interests that are directly or indirectly related to the research may include but are not limited to the following:

Research grants from funding agencies (please give the research funder and the grant number)

Honoraria for speaking at symposia

Financial support for attending symposia

Financial support for educational programs

Employment or consultation

Support from a project sponsor

Position on advisory board or board of directors or other type of management relationships

Multiple affiliations

Financial relationships, for example equity ownership or investment interest

Intellectual property rights (e.g. patents, copyrights and royalties from such rights)

Holdings of spouse and/or children that may have financial interest in the work

In addition, interests that go beyond financial interests and compensation (non-financial interests) that may be important to readers should be disclosed. These may include but are not limited to personal relationships or competing interests directly or indirectly tied to this research, or professional interests or personal beliefs that may influence your research.

The corresponding author collects the conflict of interest disclosure forms from all authors. In author collaborations where formal agreements for representation allow it, it is sufficient for the corresponding author to sign the disclosure form on behalf of all authors. Examples of forms can be found here (link to various forms TO BE INCLUDED).

The corresponding author will include a summary statement in the text of the manuscript in a separate section before the reference list that reflects what is recorded in the potential conflict of interest disclosure form(s).

See below examples of disclosures:

Funding: This study was funded by X (grant number X).

Conflict of Interest: Author A has received research grants from Company A. Author B has received a speaker honorarium from Company X and owns stock in Company Y. Author C is a member of committee Z.

If no conflict exists, the authors should state:

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

When reporting studies that involve human participants, authors should include a statement that the studies have been approved by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee and have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration or comparable standards, the authors must explain the reasons for their approach, and demonstrate that the independent ethics committee or institutional review board explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study.

The following statements should be included in the text before the References section:

Ethical approval: “All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.”

The welfare of animals used for research must be respected. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should indicate whether the institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

For studies with animals, the following statement should be included:

All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.”

If articles do not contain studies with human participants or animals by any of the authors, Springer recommends including the following sentence:

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.”

For retrospective studies, please add the following sentence:

For this type of study formal consent is not required.”

Informed consent

All individuals have individual rights that are not to be infringed. Individual participants in studies e.g. have the right to decide what happens to the (identifiable) personal data gathered and to what they have said e.g. during a study or an interview as well as to any photograph that was taken. Hence it is important that all participants gave their informed consent in writing prior to inclusion in the study. Identifying details (names, dates of birth, identity numbers and other information) of the participants that were studied should not be published in written descriptions, photographs, and genetic profiles unless the information is essential for scientific purposes and the participant (or parent or guardian if the participant is incapable) has given written informed consent for publication. Complete anonymity is difficult to achieve in some cases, and informed consent should be obtained if there is any doubt. For example, masking the eye region in photographs of participants is inadequate protection of anonymity. If identifying characteristics are altered to protect anonymity, such as in genetic profiles, authors should provide assurance that alterations do not distort scientific meaning.

The following statement should be included:

Informed consent: “Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.”

If identifying information about participants is available in the article, the following statement should be included:

Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.”

Copyright

A completed form assigning copyright to Science China Press must be returned to the Sci China Tech Sci office when the paper is accepted for publication. The copyright covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article (in various languages), including offprints and reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or other reproductions of similar nature. The Copyright Transfer Statement is available at www.SciChina.com.

After acceptance

For the paper with a great breakthrough result, quick publication will be arranged. After typesetting, page proof is usually sent electronically as email attachments to the corresponding author. The proof plus any minor corrections must be returned to the managing editor within 36 hours. Failure to do this will result in delays in publication.

Corrections can be noticed in different ways: 1) highlight the corrections and send us the print proof pages; 2) fax us the corrections; 3) highlight the corrections and send us the corrected page proof as email attachment.

After publication

The full text opens freely to the readers in China at www.SciChina.com, and is available to overseas readers at http://link.springer.com/journal/11431.

Publication charge

The black and white page is 300 RMB/page (50 US$/page). The charge for color page is listed as below. An invoice will be sent to the corresponding author by the Editorial Office. Authors will be presented one sample copy. If offprints and more sample journals are required, please contact the managing editor and pay extra fee.

……

更多详情:

https://www.springer.com/journal/11431/submission-guidelines


  • 万维QQ投稿交流群    招募志愿者

    版权所有 Copyright@2009-2015豫ICP证合字09037080号

     纯自助论文投稿平台    E-mail:eshukan@163.com


投稿问答最小化  关闭