SCI论文的修订阶段对于论文发表至关重要。
在论文经过外部评审后，期刊编辑会根据审稿人的反馈给出相应的处理意见，其中接受小修或大修是常见的结果。
返修不等于录用，但却是比直接拒稿多了一次被录用的机会。
修订的目的在于使论文更贴合期刊的标准和要求，同时提升论文的学术质量和影响力。
对待审稿意见要认真，积极地进行修改，这将有助于提高论文被接受的可能性。
以下是一些回复审稿人意见的实用建议和需要注意的细节，供您参考。
以下是 SCI 投稿各阶段的英文回复信模板（仅供参考）：
一、投稿信（Cover Letter）模板
Subject: Submission of Manuscript - [Manuscript Title]
Dear Editor,
We are pleased to submit our manuscript titled "[Manuscript Title]" for consideration in your esteemed journal. This research aims to [briefly describe the purpose of the study]. We believe that our work is highly relevant to the scope of your journal and will contribute significantly to the field of [relevant field].
The manuscript is original and has not been previously published or under consideration for publication elsewhere. All authors have approved the submission and are aware of the journal's policies.
We look forward to your positive response.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
[Corresponding Author's Name]
[Contact Information]
[Date]
二、大修回复信（Response to Major Revision）模板
Subject: Response to Reviewers' Comments - [Manuscript Title]
Dear Editor and Reviewers,
Thank you very much for your detailed and valuable comments on our manuscript titled "[Manuscript Title]". We have carefully considered each comment and made extensive revisions to improve the quality of our paper. Below is our point-by-point response to the reviewers' comments.
Reviewer 1's Comments:
Response: [Similar format as above]
Response: We fully agree with the reviewer's concern. [Explain your understanding of the comment]. To address this issue, we have made the following changes in the manuscript: [Describe the specific revisions made in the paper, including page numbers and paragraphs if possible]. The revised content is as follows: [Present the revised text or a summary of the changes].
Reason for Revision: These revisions enhance the clarity and accuracy of our presentation and strengthen the scientific validity of our study.
Comment 1: [Specific comment]
Comment 2: [Specific comment]
Reviewer 2's Comments:
Response: [Same as above]
Response: [Same as above]
Comment 1: [Specific comment]
Comment 2: [Specific comment]
We believe that these revisions have significantly improved the manuscript and addressed all the concerns raised by the reviewers. We hope that our revised manuscript is now suitable for publication in your journal.
Thank you again for your time and efforts in reviewing our manuscript.
Sincerely,
[Corresponding Author's Name]
[Contact Information]
[Date]
三、小修回复信（Response to Minor Revision）模板
Subject: Response to Minor Revision - [Manuscript Title]
Dear Editor,
Thank you for your letter regarding the minor revisions required for our manuscript titled "[Manuscript Title]". We have carefully reviewed the comments and made the following changes:
Comment 1: [Specific comment]
Response: We have made the suggested correction. In the manuscript, on page [page number], paragraph [paragraph number], we changed [original text] to [revised text]. This modification improves the readability and accuracy of the paper.
Reason for Revision: To ensure the quality and clarity of our presentation.
Comment 2: [Specific comment]
Response: [Same as above]
We appreciate the opportunity to revise our manuscript and believe that it is now in better shape. We look forward to hearing from you regarding the acceptance of our paper.
Thank you again for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
[Corresponding Author's Name]
[Contact Information]
[Date]
四、拒稿后申诉信（Appeal Letter after Rejection）模板
Subject: Appeal for Reconsideration - [Manuscript Title]
Dear Editor,
We are writing to appeal the rejection of our manuscript titled "[Manuscript Title]". We understand that the decision to reject a manuscript is a difficult one, but we believe that there may have been some misunderstandings or misinterpretations of our work.
We have carefully reviewed the reviewers' comments and would like to address each one in turn.
Reviewer 1's Comments:
Response: [Same as above]
Our Response: We respectfully disagree with the reviewer's assessment. [Explain your reasoning in detail, providing evidence if possible]. We believe that our approach is valid and our results are significant.
Supplementary Material: To support our argument, we are enclosing additional data/analysis/results that further demonstrate the value of our study.
Comment 1: [Specific comment]
Comment 2: [Specific comment]
Reviewer 2's Comments:
Response: [Same as above]
Response: [Same as above]
Comment 1: [Specific comment]
Comment 2: [Specific comment]
We understand that the publication process is highly competitive, but we believe that our work has merit and should be given another chance. We have made every effort to address the reviewers' concerns and improve the quality of our manuscript. We hope that you will reconsider our appeal and give our paper a second look.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
[Corresponding Author's Name]
[Contact Information]
[Date]
转自CAA会员服务微信公众号，仅作学习交流，如有侵权，请联系本站删除！
