投稿问答最小化  关闭

万维书刊APP下载

审稿人意见的审慎回应:为何有时不采纳建议

2024/5/9 15:18:16  阅读:22 发布者:

引言

在学术出版过程中,审稿人的建议对于提升论文质量至关重要。然而,并非所有建议都适合采纳。有时,基于研究的特定情况和学术考量,作者需要向审稿人解释为何不采纳其建议。本文将提供一些模板和策略,帮助你在不同意审稿人意见时,如何礼貌且有说服力地表达自己的立场。

审稿人意见的重要性与局限性

审稿人的意见通常基于他们对论文的理解,以及对相关领域的专业知识。然而,每个研究都有其独特性,作者对研究的理解和掌握的信息可能比审稿人更全面。在某些情况下,作者可能认为保持原有方法或论点更合适。

 解释不采纳建议的回应策略

在不同意审稿人的建议时,我们的回应应该是尊重、坚定且有理有据的。以下是一些实用的模板,帮助你构建这样的回复。

礼貌开头:

首先,我们应该对审稿人的时间和建议表示感谢,同时礼貌地介绍我们的立场。

Template:

We appreciate the reviewer's suggestion; however, after careful consideration, we have decided not to incorporate this particular change.

解释立场:

接下来,我们需要清晰地说明为何选择维持原有方法或论点。

Template:

We have chosen to maintain the original approach because [解释原因], which we believe is more suitable for the context and objectives of our study.

提供论据:

最后,我们应该提供支持我们决定的论据,包括相关文献或理论依据。

Template:

Our decision is supported by [相关文献/理论依据], which demonstrates that [进一步解释]. We are confident that our approach is appropriate and aligns with the current best practices in our field.

示例

让我们通过一个具体的例子来展示如何应用这些模板。

Example:

We appreciate the reviewer's suggestion to include a control group in our experimental design; however, after careful consideration, we have decided not to incorporate this particular change.

We have chosen to maintain the original approach because our study focuses on the comparative analysis of two distinct treatment groups within a specific cohort, where the inclusion of a traditional control group would not add significant value to the findings. Our decision is supported by recent studies in the [related field], which demonstrate that direct comparisons within a cohort can provide more nuanced insights into treatment effects.

We are confident that our approach is appropriate and aligns with the current best practices in our field. We have added a brief discussion on why a cohort-specific analysis is beneficial in our context, which can be found on page 7, lines 34-45 of the revised manuscript.

 结语

在学术出版中,与审稿人保持开放和尊重的沟通至关重要。即使在不同意审稿人的意见时,我们也应该提供充分的解释和合理的论证。通过这种方式,我们不仅能够维护研究的完整性,还能展示出我们对学术严谨性的承诺。

使用这些模板和策略,你可以构建出既坚定又礼貌的回复,表明你已经仔细考虑了审稿人的意见,但基于研究的具体情况,决定不采纳其建议。记住,每一次的审稿反馈都是提升我们研究的机会,即使最终没有采纳某些建议。

转自理论学习计算未来微信公众号,仅作学习交流,如有侵权,请联系本站删除!


  • 万维QQ投稿交流群    招募志愿者

    版权所有 Copyright@2009-2015豫ICP证合字09037080号

     纯自助论文投稿平台    E-mail:eshukan@163.com